Cell Biology International (2010) 34, 893-899 - Cannabinoids in embryoid bodies

Brought to you by Portland Press Ltd.

Published on behalf of the International Federation for Cell Biology

Editor-in-Chief

DN Wheatley
(Aberdeen, U.K.)

Co-Editor

Sidney S. Yu
(Shatin, Hong Kong)

Regional Editors

H Carvalho
(Campinas, Brazil)

H Chang Chan
(Shatin, Hong Kong)

C Green
(Auckland, New Zealand)

S Kidson
(Cape Town, South Africa)

E Nadezhdina
(Moscow, Russia)

G Sluder
(Worcester, U.S.A.)

Full Editorial Board

Managing Editor

AJ Panther
(Aberdeen, U.K.)

Medline/PubMed Citation | Related Articles in PubMed | Download to Citation Manager

Cell Biology International (2010) 34, 893–899 (Printed in Great Britain)

Abstract

Enhanced Full Text

PDF

Legacy HTML

Add a comment

Citing articles

A FANCD2 domain activates Tip60-dependent apoptosis

James Hejna, Donald Bruun¹, Daniel Pauw and Robb E Moses²

Department of Molecular and Medical Genetics, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 972393098, U.S.A.

¹Present address: 1120 Haring Hall, One Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616, U.S.A.

²To whom correspondence should be addressed (email mosesr@ohsu.edu).

This supplementary data is also available as a PDF

SUPPLEMENTARY ONLINE DATA

Figure S1 Fluorescence-based assay

(A) Transfection of GM639 fibroblasts with EGFP-exons 10–13 lacking the NLS. Numbers indicate nucleotides. (B) EYFP-exons 10–13 lacking the NLS co-transfected with ECFP-NLS. (C) GM639 fibroblasts co-transfected with ECFP-NLS and DsRed2-C1 plasmids. Left panel, blue filter; right panel, red filter.

Figure S2 Cell survival after Tip60 depletion

Tip60-depleted HeLa cells were co-transfected with EGFP-NLS (left column) or EGFP-NLS-exons 10–13 (right column) and pDsRed2-C1. Control mock-depleted cells were co-transfected with EGFP-NLS-exons 10–13 and pDsRed2-C1-exons 10–13 (middle column). Top row, DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole); middle row, EGFP; bottom row, DsRed. Apoptotic cells are identified by arrows.

Table S1 Primers used in the present study

Primer	Sequence	Position
FAD-763F	5′-CACAAAGCTTGACCCAAACTTCCTATTGAAGG-3′	763
FAD-778F	5′-CACAAAGCTTTTGAAGGTTCGCCAGTTGGTG-3′	778
FAD-799F	5′-CACAAAGCTTATGGATAAGTTGTCGTCTATTAG-3′	799
FAD-819F	5′-CACAAAGCTTATTAGATTGGAGGATTTACTGTG-3′	819
FAD-841F	5′-CACAAAGCTTATAATAAAGTTCATTCTTCATTCCG-3′	841
FAD-871F	5′-CACAAAGCTTGCCATGGATACACTTGAGG-3′	871
FAD-898F	5′-CACAAAGCTTGAGCTTCGGGAGAAGTTGG-3′	898
FAD-1016R	5′-CACAGGATCCCCGCTGCTTTCTTGATTTCC-3′	1016
FAD-1039R	5′-CACAGGATCCAGAGGAGAATAATACAGCTCTG-3′	1039
FAD-1057R	5′-CACAGGATCCCTGACTTTATTACATCAAAGAGG-3′	1057
FAD-1076R	5′-CACAGGATCCGTTTTCTCATATCTAATAGCTGAC-3′	1076
FAD-1101R	5′-CACAGGATCCTTAATCCAGGCTTCTGAAATGG-3′	1101
FAD-1245R	5′-CACAGGATCCTGCTGTTCTTGAATGCAGCCTG-3′	1245

Received 30 September 2009/28 April 2010; accepted 27 May 2010

Published as Cell Biology International Immediate Publication 27 May 2010, doi:10.1042/CBI20090251

RSS feeds

Table of contents by email

CBI home

Latest issues

Vol. 36(7): Jul 2012

Vol. 36(6): Jun 2012

Vol. 36(5): May 2012

Special online birthday collection

Browse archive